May, just maybe we can get a few of you interested in generating some interest for this forum idea? I think it would be a great addition to an already fantastic forum

Greg
kbenz wrote:anyone have anything not in XL?
I think the thing you are missing is the value of your work. If you take a sheet of 10 ga steel worth say $ 2.00 a square foot (that's just an easy number I picked) and cut out a 1' square you end up with a 1' piece of metal worth $ 2.00. If you cut a bunch of lines in that 1' square you can dramatically increase it's value. You will always have people that are too cheap to pay what it is worth, people who don't care how much it is as long as they get what they want, and people that are in the middle, the ones that are price concious but realize what they are paying for. Don't under estimate the value of your work. If you do good quality work and/or custom work, most people will pay a fair price. If $ 245.50 is too high tell them for about 10 - 20 thousand dollars they can buy their own equipment and cut it themselves! I use the spreadsheet that I originally posted on here a couple of years back. I charge by the inch cut, number of pierces, & the amount of material used but when I am cutting I am usually making from $ 150 - $ 250 an hour & sometimes more.jmsrbrt wrote:I've been looking through this forum and reading and re-reading all the posts, and looking at these spreadsheets that a few have posted, and one thing i cannot get clear in my head is the cost people are using for "inches of cut". I see it ranges from 15 cents up to 33 cents, then there is the discussion about charging $100 an hour.
My question deals with a design I'm working on. 52 inches wide by 24 inches tall. I'm cutting at 200 ipm, and my program says it will take 8 minutes 11 seconds. There are 37 pierces. If I'm cutting at 200 inches per minute, for 8.1833 minutes, that would mean 1636.66 inches of cutting, and at the lower value of 15 cents, that equates to $245.50 which seems WAY TOO HIGH for my little brain. Am I missing something in the math??
Sampson Jones wrote:O k Im gonna step in it , what exactly is considered the number of indexs ?