

The misnaming of the function "Overcut to reduce Undercutting" refers to the WIDTH of the closed path the torch wedges through. It tells me that even PlasmaCam could not clearly explain what it was doing.

It is in fact "overcutting" that closed path. However, the MIN. and MAX. numbers entered actually refer to the distance between leading quadrant of the kerf and the NODE at the actual end of the path. So you are ACTUALLY setting the amount of UNDERCUT. You are telling the torch how much of the actual path you DO NOT want to cut. The file I uploaded shows this.
When people say, "What numbers do I enter for Minimum and Maximum?" the chart in the file shows what the result will be, based on the kerf width setting and the width of the closed path it is trying to wedge itself through, and where it is in relation to the RANGE established by the MIN. and MAX. values.
To determine where the torch will stop cutting, you enter the two numbers, and this establishes the RANGE where the kerf must make a decision. (represented by the rectangular closed path)
If the closed path is still wide enough for the kerf to fit through inside of the range, it will continue until Condition 1 the width of the closed path is equal to the kerf width.
In this example, the MAX. distance was set to 2 FEET but the .08 kerf STOPPED at 1.960 feet because that distance from the leading quadrant of the kerf to the node at the end of the path fell within the (Min / Max) RANGE when the closed path was exactly .08" wide.
Example in file (Kerf = .08 Min. 1" / Max. 2")
If the closed path is NOT wide enough for the kerf to fit through inside of the range, it will continue until Condition 2 the forward quadrant of the kerf hits the minimum distance from the END of the path.
In this example, the MIN. distance was set to 1 FOOT but the .12 kerf had already spilled over the closed path ("overcut") BEFORE ENTERING THE RANGE, so it continued cutting until it met condition 2; the distance from the leading quadrant of the kerf to the node at the end of the path, which was set to 1 FOOT.
Example in file (Kerf = .12 Min. 1" / Max. 2")
So it really should be called UNDERCUT to prevent OVERCUTTING, because although it IS "overcutting" the closed path on both sides as it follows the closed path, the point where the torch STOPS cutting is set by the distance from the leading quadrant of the kerf to the NODE at the END of the closed path in relation to where that point falls inside of, or outside of the RANGE established by entering the MIN and MAX distances.
If the OVERCUT of the closed path happens, what STOPS the torch from cutting to infinity? Why doesn't it just keep cutting to the NODE at the end of the closed path before reversing direction? It is stopped by a CALCULATION determined by the distance from the forward quadrant of the kerf (The "nose" of the comet) to the NODE at the end of the path, and the decision to STOP cutting is determined by whether the kerf is INSIDE or OUTSIDE of that RANGE at the moment one of two conditions are met.
Study the numbers in the chart to see this. ZOOM IN as some of the dimensions are very small and cannot be seen at the F5 view of the chart.
Joe
.