Im wondering mr. Colt, for the best holes possible, you say to use a straight lead-in,
but when looking at true hole, they use an arc lead-in. Why?
Is it because of air plasma vs hy-def plasma?
Hypertherm true hole technology
-
- 2.5 Star Member
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:12 pm
-
- 5 Star Elite Contributing Member
- Posts: 3087
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:18 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Hypertherm true hole technology
True Hole auto switches from oxygen plasma with air shield to oxygen plasma with oxygen shield as soon as the pierce is complete. The characteristics of an oxygen/oxygen high definition plasma arc are very aggressive, in fact instantly the kerf width doubles in size. So....this process uses canned lead in shapes that utilize 3 velocity changes during the lead-in which controls the bottom position of the arc very accurately to minimize taper, dings and divots. The process is very robust and produces some amazingly nice hole quality.
When I am talking about getting the best hole quality out of an air plasma....or any plasma that does not use the TrueHole processes, then I suggest the straight lead in because it seems to work best on a mechanically tight machine with decent acceleration. If you have a machine with terribly slow acceleration or mechanical backlash....often you will be better off experimenting with a radial lead-in.
The keys to minimizing the dings and divots associated with the lead in kerf: high acceleration, accurate torch to work distance, mechanically tight machine (no backlash).
The keys to minimizing the dings and divots associated with the end of cut (arc off/motion stop): Coordinated overburn and arc off timing while machine motion continues.
The keys to minimal taper in holes (assuming you don't have True Hole): using the lowest power level consumables for the material thickness, running at approximately 60% of the recommended cut speed, accurate torch to work distance.
Jim Colt Hypertherm
When I am talking about getting the best hole quality out of an air plasma....or any plasma that does not use the TrueHole processes, then I suggest the straight lead in because it seems to work best on a mechanically tight machine with decent acceleration. If you have a machine with terribly slow acceleration or mechanical backlash....often you will be better off experimenting with a radial lead-in.
The keys to minimizing the dings and divots associated with the lead in kerf: high acceleration, accurate torch to work distance, mechanically tight machine (no backlash).
The keys to minimizing the dings and divots associated with the end of cut (arc off/motion stop): Coordinated overburn and arc off timing while machine motion continues.
The keys to minimal taper in holes (assuming you don't have True Hole): using the lowest power level consumables for the material thickness, running at approximately 60% of the recommended cut speed, accurate torch to work distance.
Jim Colt Hypertherm
-
- 2.5 Star Member
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:12 pm
Re: Hypertherm true hole technology
Thank you!